A heat exchanger is a piece of process equipment that transfers thermal energy from a hotter fluid to a colder one, normally through a metal wall that keeps the two streams apart. Heat exchangers are classified by flow arrangement (counterflow, parallel flow, crossflow, multipass) and by construction (shell-and-tube, double-pipe, plate, plate-fin, spiral, air-cooled, direct-contact and regenerative). The duty is sized with Q = U × A × F × LMTD. Shell-and-tube units are designed to TEMA and API 660 with pressure parts to ASME Section VIII, air coolers to API 661, and plate units to API 662. Reliable service depends on correct fluid allocation, controlled fouling, regular NDT of tubes and disciplined turnaround maintenance.
Heat exchangers are the most common piece of equipment in refineries, petrochemical complexes, fertilizer plants, power stations, HVAC systems and food plants. A typical refinery crude unit alone can contain more than a hundred of them, and their fouling and leaks quietly drive fuel cost, throughput limits and unplanned shutdowns.
This guide explains how heat exchangers work, every major type and when to use it, the TEMA designation system, thermal design with a fully worked LMTD example, the current codes and standards, materials, damage mechanisms, inspection techniques and a field-proven maintenance procedure. It is written from 26+ years of hands-on project, shutdown and turnaround work on exchangers in oil & gas, petrochemical, fertilizer, cement and power plants.
How a heat exchanger works
Heat always flows from the hotter fluid to the colder fluid, and a heat exchanger simply provides enough surface, turbulence and temperature difference for that transfer to happen at the required rate. In a recuperative (wall-type) exchanger, heat passes in series through the hot-side film, any hot-side fouling, the metal wall, any cold-side fouling and the cold-side film. The sum of these resistances gives the overall heat transfer coefficient U.
Rate equation: Q = U·A·F·ΔTlm, ΔTlm = (ΔT1 − ΔT2) / ln(ΔT1/ΔT2)
Overall coefficient (on outside area): 1/Uo = 1/ho + Rf,o + (do·ln(do/di))/(2kw) + Rf,i·(do/di) + (1/hi)·(do/di)
Effectiveness: ε = Q / [Cmin·(Th,in − Tc,in)], NTU = U·A / Cmin
Q is the duty (W), U the overall coefficient (W/m²K), A the heat transfer area (m²), F the LMTD correction factor for multipass or crossflow (F = 1 for pure counterflow), ΔT1 and ΔT2 the terminal temperature differences, Rf the fouling resistances and C = m·cp the heat capacity rate of each stream. The LMTD method is convenient when all four terminal temperatures are known (design); the ε–NTU method is better when outlet temperatures are unknown (rating an existing exchanger).
Heat exchanger flow arrangements compared
The flow arrangement decides how much of the available temperature difference can actually be used. For the same U and area, counterflow transfers the most heat, parallel flow the least, and crossflow or multipass designs fall in between. Industrial shell-and-tube exchangers are mostly multipass (one shell pass, two or more tube passes), so their LMTD is corrected with the factor F.
| Arrangement | Thermal efficiency | Temperature cross | LMTD correction F | Typical equipment | Best used when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counterflow | Highest for a given area | Yes | 1.0 | Double-pipe, hairpin, plate, F-shell, multiple shells in series | Close temperature approach or heat recovery is required |
| Parallel (co-current) flow | Lowest | No | Use parallel LMTD | Some heaters, quench and viscous-fluid service | Wall temperature must be limited or the cold fluid must not overheat |
| Crossflow | Intermediate | Limited | Chart value, often 0.85–1.0 | Air-cooled exchangers, plate-fin, finned coils, HVAC | One stream is a gas flowing across tube banks |
| Multipass 1-2 (E shell) | Between parallel and counterflow | Small cross only | Calculated; design F ≥ 0.75–0.80 | Most shell-and-tube exchangers | General process duties with moderate approach temperatures |
| Cross-counterflow (multi-row) | Approaches counterflow with more rows | Yes, with 4+ passes | Approaches 1.0 | Air coolers with several tube passes, economisers | Gas heat recovery and air cooling with close approach |
Classification of heat exchangers by construction
At the top level, heat exchangers are either recuperative or regenerative. In a recuperative exchanger both fluids flow at the same time in separate passages and heat crosses the wall between them. In a regenerative exchanger the hot and cold streams take turns flowing through the same matrix: the matrix stores heat during the hot period and releases it during the cold period. Recuperators are then divided into indirect-contact (wall-separated), direct-contact (fluids touch) and special designs.
Types of heat exchangers: selection table
Use the table below as a first screening tool. Pressure and temperature limits are typical commercial ranges and depend strongly on size, material and manufacturer; always confirm with vendor data and the governing code.
| Type | Typical max pressure | Typical temperature range | Area density | Fouling / cleaning | Main strengths | Typical service | Governing standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tubular | |||||||
| Shell-and-tube | Very high (300+ bar tube side possible) | Cryogenic to about 600 °C+ | Low (approx. 50–100 m²/m³) | Good; mechanical cleaning of tubes, removable bundles | Robust, any duty, widely understood | Refinery, petrochemical, power, chemical | TEMA, API 660 / ISO 16812, ASME VIII |
| Double-pipe / hairpin | Very high | Wide | Low | Good; removable inner pipe or bundle | True counterflow, modular, small duties | High-pressure, small or fouling duties | ASME VIII / B31.3, API 660 (hairpin) |
| Air-cooled (fin-fan) | High (tube side) | Process side up to about 350–400 °C | Medium (finned) | Air side needs fin washing; tube side plugs | No cooling water, low operating cost | Overhead condensers, product coolers, gas coolers | API 661 / ISO 13706 |
| Coil / jacketed vessel | Low–medium | Wide | Low | Difficult inside coils | Simple, combined with mixing | Reactors, storage tank heating | ASME VIII |
| Plate type | |||||||
| Gasketed plate-and-frame | Up to about 25–30 bar | About −30 to 180 °C (gasket-limited) | High (approx. 120–660 m²/m³) | Excellent; open and clean plates | Very high U, compact, extendable | Food, HVAC, cooling water, district heating | API 662 Part 1, ISO 15547-1, AHRI 400 |
| Brazed plate | Up to about 30–45 bar | About −195 to 200 °C | High | Chemical cleaning only | Compact, cheap, no gaskets | Refrigeration, heat pumps, hydraulics | Manufacturer / PED / ASME |
| Welded plate (block, shell-and-plate) | Up to about 40–100 bar | Up to about 350–500 °C | High | Limited to chemical; some designs openable | High U with no gaskets | Refinery feed/effluent, ammonia, solvents | API 662, ISO 15547 |
| Plate-fin (brazed aluminium) | Up to about 100+ bar | Cryogenic to about 65 °C (aluminium) | Very high (up to approx. 1500+ m²/m³) | Clean fluids only | Multi-stream, very close approach | LNG, air separation, NGL recovery | ALPEMA, ISO 15547-2 |
| Spiral plate | Up to about 25 bar | Up to about 400 °C | Medium–high | Excellent; self-cleaning single channel | Handles slurries, fibres, sludge | Slurries, waste water, viscous fluids | API 664 |
| Printed-circuit (diffusion bonded) | Very high (500+ bar) | Cryogenic to about 800 °C | Very high | Clean fluids only; filtration required | Extreme pressure in compact size | Offshore gas, supercritical CO₂ | ASME VIII |
| Direct contact and regenerative | |||||||
| Cooling tower | Atmospheric | Ambient–about 60 °C water | Packing-dependent | Fill fouling, biological growth | Cheapest large-scale heat rejection | Power plant and refinery cooling water | CTI standards |
| Direct-contact condenser | Low | Wide | High surface from sprays | Few surfaces to foul | Low capital cost, low pressure drop | Geothermal, vacuum systems | HEI (condensers) |
| Rotary regenerator | Low | Up to about 400–500 °C | Very high | Soot blowing and washing | Very compact gas–gas recovery | Boiler air preheaters, HVAC wheels | Manufacturer standards |
| Special | |||||||
| Heat pipe | Low–medium | Working-fluid dependent | Medium | External fins only | Passive, isothermal, no moving parts | Electronics, waste heat recovery | Manufacturer |
| Scraped-surface | Medium | Process-dependent | Low | Scraper removes deposits continuously | Handles crystallising and viscous products | Food, pharma, wax, crystallisers | 3-A, EHEDG (hygienic) |
Shell-and-tube heat exchangers and TEMA types
The shell-and-tube heat exchanger is the workhorse of the process industries because it can be built for almost any pressure, temperature, size and fluid. One fluid flows inside the tubes (tube side) and the other flows over the outside of the tubes inside the shell (shell side). Its four main assemblies are:
- Front (stationary) head – the channel or bonnet where the tube-side fluid enters; pass partition plates divide it for multiple tube passes.
- Shell – the pressure envelope around the bundle with inlet and outlet nozzles, impingement protection and sometimes a longitudinal baffle.
- Tube bundle – tubes, tubesheets, baffles or support plates, tie rods and spacers; it may be fixed or removable.
- Rear head – returns or discharges the tube-side fluid and, in floating-head designs, allows the bundle to expand freely.
TEMA designation system (front head – shell – rear head)
The Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association (TEMA) describes every shell-and-tube exchanger with three letters followed by size: for example, a 24-192 AES has a 24 in nominal shell inside diameter, 192 in nominal tube length, a removable-cover channel (A), a one-pass shell (E) and a floating head with backing device (S). The current TEMA Standards (11th edition) also define three mechanical classes: R for severe petroleum and process service, C for moderate commercial service and B for chemical process service.
| Letter | Position | Description | When to specify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front (stationary) head | |||
| A | Front head | Channel with removable cover | Tube side needs frequent cleaning or inspection without disturbing piping |
| B | Front head | Bonnet (integral cover) | Clean tube-side fluid; lowest cost and fewest gaskets |
| C | Front head | Channel integral with tubesheet, removable cover (removable bundle) | High-pressure tube side with removable bundle |
| N | Front head | Channel integral with tubesheet, removable cover (fixed tubesheet) | High pressure or hazardous fluid, minimum joints |
| D | Front head | Special high-pressure closure | Very high tube-side pressure (hydrotreaters, feed/effluent) |
| Shell type | |||
| E | Shell | One-pass shell | Default choice for most duties |
| F | Shell | Two-pass shell with longitudinal baffle | Temperature cross with counterflow in one shell; check baffle leakage |
| G | Shell | Split flow | Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers, low pressure drop |
| H | Shell | Double split flow | Very low shell-side pressure drop |
| J | Shell | Divided flow (one inlet, two outlets or reverse) | Low pressure drop, condensers under vacuum |
| K | Shell | Kettle-type reboiler | Pool boiling with vapour disengagement space |
| X | Shell | Cross flow | Vacuum condensers and very low pressure drop gas service |
| Rear head | |||
| L, M, N | Rear head | Fixed tubesheet (like A, B, N stationary heads) | Clean shell side, low differential expansion (expansion joint if needed) |
| P | Rear head | Outside packed floating head | Mild, non-hazardous fluids only (rarely used today) |
| S | Rear head | Floating head with backing device (split ring) | Fouling shell side, large temperature difference, full bundle removal |
| T | Rear head | Pull-through floating head | Bundle pulled without dismantling the floating head; larger shell for same tube count |
| U | Rear head | U-tube bundle | High pressure, large differential expansion, clean tube side |
| W | Rear head | Externally sealed floating tubesheet (lantern ring) | Low-pressure, non-hazardous fluids only |
Which fluid goes on the tube side?
Fluid allocation is one of the most important decisions in shell-and-tube design because it fixes cleanability, cost and safety. The usual rules are summarised below; when rules conflict, safety and maintainability normally win over thermal performance.
| Fluid property | Preferred side | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Higher pressure | Tube side | Small-diameter tubes take pressure cheaply; avoids a thick, heavy shell |
| Corrosive fluid | Tube side | Only tubes, tubesheets and channel need expensive alloy |
| Heavily fouling fluid / cooling water | Tube side | Straight tubes can be hydrojetted or brushed; velocity is easier to control |
| Toxic or lethal fluid | Tube side | Fewer gasketed joints to the atmosphere; easier leak containment |
| Very high temperature | Tube side | Limits expensive alloy and insulation to the tube side |
| Viscous fluid or low flow rate | Shell side | Baffles create turbulence at lower Reynolds numbers, raising the film coefficient |
| Condensing vapour | Shell side (usually) | Large flow area and low pressure drop; condensate drains freely |
| Fluid with low allowable pressure drop | Shell side | Larger flow area; choose J, X or G/H shell if needed |
| Boiling liquid (reboiler) | Shell side | Kettle (K) or thermosiphon (G, H, J) shells give vapour disengagement |
Tube and baffle geometry: typical design values
| Parameter | Typical value | Design note |
|---|---|---|
| Tube outside diameter | 19.05 mm (3/4 in) and 25.4 mm (1 in); 15.88–38.1 mm range | 19.05 mm is most common; 25.4 mm for fouling or mechanical cleaning |
| Tube wall (gauge) | 14–16 BWG carbon steel; 16–18 BWG alloys | Corrosion allowance and pressure govern; API 660 sets minimum thickness |
| Tube length | 6.1 m (20 ft) standard; up to about 12 m | Longer tubes reduce cost per m² but need bundle-pulling space |
| Tube pitch | 1.25 × tube OD (minimum) | Increase to allow 6–7 mm cleaning lanes on square pitch |
| Layout 30° (triangular) | Highest tube count and ho | Clean shell side only (chemical cleaning) |
| Layout 90° / 45° (square / rotated square) | Lower tube count | Mechanical shell-side cleaning; 45° gives better ho than 90° |
| Baffle cut | 20–35% of shell ID (25% common) | Horizontal cut for single phase; vertical cut for condensing or solids |
| Baffle spacing | 0.2–1.0 × shell ID (min about 50 mm) | Check unsupported span and flow-induced vibration |
| Tube-side velocity (liquids) | About 1–2.5 m/s | Cooling water above about 1 m/s to limit fouling; respect erosion limits of Cu alloys |
| Shell-side velocity (liquids) | About 0.3–1 m/s | Check nozzle ρv² against TEMA impingement limits |
Plate, plate-fin and spiral heat exchangers
Plate heat exchangers pack a large area into a small volume by stacking thin corrugated plates, so each fluid flows in alternate narrow channels. The corrugations (chevron pattern) create strong turbulence even at low velocity, which gives overall coefficients typically three to five times higher than a shell-and-tube unit in water service and allows temperature approaches as close as 1–2 °C.
- Gasketed plate-and-frame: plates held between a fixed and a movable frame plate by tie bolts. Gaskets seal each channel and route the fluids through corner ports. Easy to open, clean and extend; limited by gasket pressure and temperature. Double-wall plates or leak-detection gaskets are used where cross-contamination is unacceptable.
- Brazed plate: plates copper- or nickel-brazed into a sealed block. Compact and inexpensive, but cannot be opened, so only clean fluids or chemical cleaning are acceptable.
- Welded plate: laser-welded plate packs (block, shell-and-plate or semi-welded cassettes) for higher pressure, temperature or aggressive fluids where gaskets are not acceptable.
- Plate-fin: corrugated fins brazed between flat parting sheets, usually aluminium. Up to about a dozen streams in one core with very close approach – the standard choice for LNG and air separation cold boxes, designed to ALPEMA.
- Spiral plate: two long plates rolled into a spiral to form a single curved channel for each fluid. The single channel scours itself, so it tolerates slurries, fibres and sludge that would block other designs.
- Lamella: flattened tubes (lamellae) inside a shell; a hybrid of plate and shell-and-tube used in pulp and paper where wide flow passages are needed.
Air-cooled heat exchangers (fin-fan coolers)
An air-cooled heat exchanger rejects process heat directly to ambient air, removing the need for cooling water, cooling towers and water treatment. It consists of finned-tube bundles with headers, one or more axial fans, drives and a supporting structure. Design and supply in the oil and gas industry follow API 661 / ISO 13706, and thermal performance testing follows ASME PTC 30.
Air coolers are selected when cooling water is scarce or expensive, the process outlet temperature can be about 10–15 °C above the design dry-bulb temperature, and plot space is available. Key design checks include design ambient temperature (summer extreme), header type (plug, cover-plate or manifold) for the process pressure, fin type (embedded, extruded or wrapped) for temperature and corrosion, winterisation for viscous or freezing fluids and fan noise limits.
Direct-contact exchangers and regenerators
Direct-contact exchangers transfer heat by mixing or intimately contacting the two streams, so there is no wall to foul and no wall resistance. They are only suitable when the fluids are immiscible, can be separated afterwards, or when one of them is meant to change phase. Examples are cooling towers (where most heat leaves by evaporation, so make-up water is needed continuously), spray and barometric condensers, steam injection heaters, desuperheaters, quench towers and submerged-combustion evaporators.
Regenerators store heat in a solid matrix. Fixed-bed (static) regenerators need at least two beds switched by valves so that one heats while the other cools; rotary regenerators such as the Ljungström boiler air preheater rotate a packed wheel continuously between the hot flue gas and the cold combustion air. Their main issues are carry-over and leakage between streams through the seals, which is why they are used mostly for gas-to-gas heat recovery where small cross-contamination is acceptable.
Thermal design: LMTD, overall U and fouling
Thermal design means finding the area that delivers the required duty within the allowable pressure drops, with enough margin for fouling, while staying mechanically sound and free of flow-induced vibration. A practical sequence is:
- Fix the process data: flows, inlet and outlet temperatures, allowable pressure drops, fluid properties and fouling resistances for both streams.
- Close the heat balance so that the hot-side and cold-side duties agree.
- Calculate LMTD for counterflow and the correction factor F for the chosen shell and pass arrangement; add shells in series if F < 0.75–0.80.
- Estimate U from typical values, then calculate the required area A = Q / (U · F · LMTD).
- Select geometry (TEMA type, tube size, length, passes, baffles) and calculate film coefficients and pressure drops with a rigorous method (Bell–Delaware or stream analysis).
- Iterate until calculated U, area margin and pressure drops are acceptable; check vibration, nozzle ρv² and tube-rupture relief per API 521.
- Complete mechanical design to ASME Section VIII (tubesheets per Part UHX), TEMA class and API 660, then issue the datasheet.
| Hot fluid | Cold fluid | Typical U (W/m²K) | Typical U (Btu/h·ft²·°F) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolers and exchangers (no phase change) | |||
| Water | Water | 800–1500 | 140–265 |
| Light organics (viscosity below 0.5 cP) | Water | 350–900 | 60–160 |
| Medium organics (0.5–1 cP) | Water | 250–600 | 45–105 |
| Heavy organics (above 1 cP) | Water | 60–300 | 10–55 |
| Gases | Water | 20–300 | 4–55 |
| Light organics | Light organics | 200–500 | 35–90 |
| Gases | Gases | 10–50 | 2–9 |
| Heaters (condensing steam) | |||
| Steam | Water | 1500–4000 | 265–700 |
| Steam | Light oils | 300–900 | 55–160 |
| Steam | Heavy oils | 60–450 | 10–80 |
| Steam | Gases | 30–300 | 5–55 |
| Condensers and vaporisers | |||
| Aqueous vapours | Water | 1000–1500 | 175–265 |
| Organic vapours | Water | 700–1000 | 125–175 |
| Steam | Aqueous liquids (vaporiser) | 1000–1500 | 175–265 |
| Steam | Light organics (vaporiser) | 900–1200 | 160–210 |
| Plate heat exchangers (for comparison) | |||
| Water | Water (gasketed plate) | 3000–7000 | 530–1230 |
Fouling resistances
Fouling is the build-up of scale, corrosion products, biological growth, coke, polymer or particulate on heat transfer surfaces. It adds a thermal resistance Rf to each side. Designers include it as extra area (typically 10–30% over the clean area), but excessive fouling margins can backfire: lower velocities in an oversized unit can make fouling worse. Typical design values based on TEMA are:
| Fluid | Rf (m²K/W) | Rf (h·ft²·°F/Btu) | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water | |||
| Sea water (below 50 °C) | 0.000088 | 0.0005 | Velocity above about 1 m/s; biofouling control required |
| Treated cooling tower water | 0.00018–0.00035 | 0.001–0.002 | Depends on treatment programme and temperature |
| River / untreated water | 0.00035–0.00053 | 0.002–0.003 | Silt and biological fouling |
| Treated boiler feedwater | 0.000088–0.00018 | 0.0005–0.001 | Clean service |
| Process and utility fluids | |||
| Steam (oil-free) | 0.000088 | 0.0005 | Clean condensing service |
| Natural gas, compressed air | 0.00018–0.00035 | 0.001–0.002 | Dust or oil carry-over raises fouling |
| Refrigerant liquids | 0.00018 | 0.001 | Clean |
| Light hydrocarbons / naphtha | 0.00018–0.00035 | 0.001–0.002 | Clean to moderate |
| Crude oil | 0.00035–0.00088 | 0.002–0.005 | Depends on temperature, velocity and desalting |
| Heavy fuel oil / residue | 0.00088 | 0.005 | Heavily fouling; consider higher velocities |
Worked example: sizing a shell-and-tube cooler
A light hydrocarbon stream of 10 kg/s (cp = 2.5 kJ/kgK) must be cooled from 120 °C to 60 °C with cooling water entering at 30 °C and leaving at 40 °C (cp = 4.18 kJ/kgK). The exchanger is a one-shell-pass, two-tube-pass (1-2) unit, cooling water on the tube side, with an assumed service U of 450 W/m²K.
2. Water flow: mw = 1500 / (4.18 × 10) = 35.9 kg/s (about 129 m³/h)
3. Terminal differences (counterflow): ΔT1 = 120 − 40 = 80 K, ΔT2 = 60 − 30 = 30 K
4. LMTD = (80 − 30) / ln(80/30) = 50.98 K
5. R = (120 − 60)/(40 − 30) = 6.0; P = (40 − 30)/(120 − 30) = 0.111 → F = 0.958 (1-2 exchanger)
6. Area: A = 1 500 000 / (450 × 0.958 × 50.98) = 68.2 m²
7. Tubes: 19.05 mm OD × 6.0 m effective length = 0.359 m² per tube → about 190 tubes (95 per pass)
8. Check: Cmin = 25 kW/K, Cr = 0.167, ε = 1500 / (25 × 90) = 0.667, NTU = 1.23
With F close to 1, one shell is adequate. In practice the designer would add about 10–20% area margin, check that the tube-side water velocity stays above roughly 1 m/s (95 tubes per pass in 19.05 mm × 2.11 mm tubes gives about 2.2 m/s, which is acceptable for carbon steel or stainless tubes), and then verify pressure drops and vibration in thermal design software.
LMTD, area and fouling calculators
Quick checks for design reviews and plant troubleshooting. Calculations run in your browser; nothing is sent to a server. For full shell-and-tube sizing use the Aienginear heat exchanger sizing calculator.
LMTD, F-factor and required area
Fouling resistance from plant data
The Aienginear heat exchanger sizing calculator estimates duty, LMTD, area, tube count and shell size, with printable results for your design file.
Heat exchanger codes and standards (latest editions)
Heat exchanger design is governed by a pressure-equipment code for the pressure parts plus an equipment standard for the exchanger type. Always work to the edition named in the project specification; the list below reflects the documents in common use in 2026.
| Standard | Scope | Where it applies |
|---|---|---|
| Design and fabrication | ||
| TEMA Standards (11th edition) | Mechanical standards for shell-and-tube exchangers: nomenclature, classes R/C/B, tolerances, fouling, vibration | All shell-and-tube exchangers, worldwide |
| ASME BPVC Section VIII, Div. 1 and Div. 2 (2025 edition) | Pressure vessel design; Part UHX covers tubesheet rules | Shells, channels, tubesheets, nozzles, flanges |
| API Std 660 / ISO 16812 | Shell-and-tube exchangers for petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries | Refinery and petrochemical shell-and-tube units |
| API Std 661 / ISO 13706 | Air-cooled heat exchangers for general refinery service | Fin-fan coolers and condensers |
| API Std 662 Parts 1 and 2 / ISO 15547 | Plate heat exchangers (plate-and-frame, brazed aluminium plate-fin) | Plate exchangers in hydrocarbon service |
| API Std 664 | Spiral plate heat exchangers | Slurry and fouling services |
| ALPEMA Standards | Brazed aluminium plate-fin heat exchangers | LNG, air separation, cryogenic plants |
| HEI Standards | Steam surface condensers and closed feedwater heaters | Power plant condensers and feedwater heaters |
| EN 13445 and PED 2014/68/EU | European unfired pressure vessel standard and directive | Equipment supplied to the EU / UK markets |
| Testing and performance | ||
| ASME PTC 12.5 | Single-phase heat exchanger performance testing | Acceptance and performance tests |
| ASME PTC 30 / PTC 30.1 | Air-cooled heat exchangers and air-cooled steam condensers | Fin-fan performance tests |
| AHRI Std 400 | Performance rating of liquid-to-liquid heat exchangers | Plate exchangers for HVAC |
| Safety, operation and integrity | ||
| API Std 521 / ISO 23251 | Pressure relief: tube rupture case (10/13 rule) | Relief design for high-pressure tube side |
| ASME PCC-1 (2022) | Pressure boundary bolted flange joint assembly | Channel covers, girth flanges, nozzle flanges |
| ASME PCC-2 | Repair of pressure equipment and piping | Repairs, sleeves, plugging |
| API 510 / API RP 572 | Pressure vessel inspection code / inspection practices | In-service inspection of exchanger shells and channels |
| API RP 571 | Damage mechanisms affecting fixed equipment | Corrosion and damage reviews |
| API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 | Fitness-for-service assessment | Thinning, pitting, cracks and dents |
| API RP 580 / API RP 581 | Risk-based inspection | Inspection planning for exchanger populations |
| ASME BPVC Section V | Non-destructive examination methods | NDT procedures for tubes and welds |
Tube rupture: the 10/13 rule
- API 521 allows the tube-rupture relief case to be ignored when the low-pressure side, including upstream and downstream systems, has a design pressure of at least 10/13 of the high-pressure side design pressure (the corrected hydrotest pressure of the LP side then equals or exceeds the HP-side design pressure).
- If the LP side is below this ratio, a relief device or a dynamic analysis is required. Use the Aienginear tube rupture relief valve suite for the calculation.
Heat exchanger material selection
| Material | Typical specifications | Strengths | Limitations | Typical service |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon steel | SA-179, SA-214, SA-334 (low temp.), SA-516 shells | Low cost, easy to weld, good thermal conductivity | General corrosion, poor in seawater and acids | Hydrocarbons, steam, treated cooling water |
| Low-alloy Cr-Mo | SA-213 T11/T22/T5/T9, SA-387 shells | High-temperature strength, H₂ and sulfidation resistance | Needs PWHT; not for chloride water | Hydrotreaters, high-temperature refinery service |
| Stainless steel 304L / 316L | SA-213, SA-249, SA-688 | Good general corrosion resistance | Chloride stress corrosion cracking, pitting in seawater | Chemicals, food, clean water |
| Duplex 2205 / super duplex 2507 | SA-789, SA-790 | High strength, resists chloride SCC | Embrittlement above about 280 °C | Seawater, sour and chloride service |
| Copper alloys (admiralty, 90/10 and 70/30 Cu-Ni) | SB-111, SB-395 | Excellent conductivity, biofouling resistance | Ammonia SCC, erosion at high velocity, sulfides | Seawater coolers, condensers, lube oil coolers |
| Titanium Gr. 2 | SB-338 | Outstanding seawater and chloride resistance | Higher cost, hydriding risk, galvanic issues | Seawater coolers, power plant condensers, plate packs |
| Nickel alloys (625, C-276, 825) | SB-163, SB-444, SB-619 | Resist strong acids, chlorides, high temperature | High cost | Acid gas, HCl, sulfuric acid service |
| Graphite / SiC / glass / PTFE | Manufacturer standards | Resistance to very aggressive acids | Low pressure, brittle | Acid heaters and coolers in chemical plants |
Heat exchanger failure and damage mechanisms
Most heat exchanger problems are caused by a small number of damage mechanisms, and each leaves a recognisable signature in operating data or inspection results.
| Mechanism | Typical location | Operating symptom | Detection | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fouling (scale, biofilm, coke, polymer) | Tube ID (water), shell side (hydrocarbons) | Falling U, rising ΔP, higher approach temperature | Performance trending, visual at opening | Velocity control, water treatment, antifoulants, scheduled cleaning |
| Under-deposit and pitting corrosion | Tube ID under deposits, stagnant zones | Tube leaks, contamination of the low-pressure side | ECT / IRIS, leak testing | Keep velocity above about 1 m/s, upgrade alloy, chlorination control |
| Erosion and erosion-corrosion | Tube inlets, U-bends, under shell inlet nozzle | Thinning at tube ends, leaks near inlet | IRIS, ECT, visual | Tube inserts / ferrules, impingement plate, velocity limits |
| Flow-induced vibration | Tubes at baffle holes, inlet / outlet zones | Noise, tube fretting leaks soon after start-up | ECT wear signals at baffles | Support spacing per TEMA, no-tubes-in-window, re-design |
| Chloride stress corrosion cracking | Austenitic stainless tubes and welds above about 60 °C | Sudden cracking leaks | ECT, PT on tubesheet | Duplex or titanium, control chlorides and temperature |
| Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) | Low-flow cooling water, after hydrotest water left in | Localised pits, nodules | Visual, ECT, deposit analysis | Drain and dry after hydrotest, biocide programme |
| Tube-to-tubesheet joint leakage | Expanded or welded joints | Cross-contamination, pressure equalisation | Leak test, helium or bubble test | Proper roll expansion, seal welding, re-rolling |
| Thermal fatigue and differential expansion | Fixed tubesheets, expansion joints, U-bends | Cracks at tubesheet ligaments or joint welds | PT/MT, UT, ECT | Start-up / shutdown rates, expansion joint, U-tube or floating head |
| Gasket and bolted joint leakage | Channel cover, girth flanges, floating head | Leaks at hydrotest or after thermal cycles | Visual, leak test | Bolt-up per ASME PCC-1, correct gasket, controlled torque or tensioning |
| Galvanic corrosion | Dissimilar tube / tubesheet / channel metals | Attack of the less noble metal near joints | Visual, UT thickness | Compatible materials, coatings, sacrificial anodes in water boxes |
Inspection and NDT of heat exchanger tubes
Tube NDT should be matched to the tube material and the expected damage. Results are used to decide whether to plug, sleeve, retube or replace the bundle.
| Technique | Tube materials | Detects | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eddy current testing (ECT) | Non-ferromagnetic: stainless, Cu alloys, titanium, nickel alloys | Pitting, wall loss, cracks, fretting at baffles | Fast (hundreds of tubes per shift), high sensitivity | Not for carbon steel without special probes |
| Remote field testing (RFT) | Ferromagnetic: carbon steel, Cr-Mo | General wall loss, large pits | Works through full wall of ferrous tubes | Lower resolution for small pits |
| Near field testing (NFT) | Finned carbon steel tubes (air coolers) | ID pitting and erosion | Good for fin-fan tubes | ID defects only |
| Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) | Ferromagnetic and finned tubes | Pitting, circumferential defects | Fast screening | Sizing less accurate than UT |
| IRIS (internal rotary UT) | All metals | Accurate wall thickness mapping | Best sizing accuracy; validates ECT/RFT | Slow; tubes must be very clean |
| Hydrostatic and pneumatic leak test | All | Through-wall leaks, joint leaks | Simple, required after repair | Does not show remaining wall |
| Helium leak test | All | Very small leaks at joints and tubes | Very high sensitivity | Needs clean, dry exchanger and specialist equipment |
| Visual, borescope, UT and PT/MT | Shells, channels, nozzles, tubesheets | Corrosion, cracking, gasket face damage | Low cost, always required | Surface or local only |
Heat exchanger maintenance and turnaround procedure
Heat exchangers rarely fail without warning. In the field, rising pressure drop, a growing approach temperature, a falling overall U or traces of process fluid in the cooling water almost always appear weeks or months before a forced shutdown. Good maintenance turns these signals into planned work during a turnaround rather than emergency repairs.
Step-by-step exchanger maintenance in a turnaround
- Plan from data: review U and ΔP trends, previous inspection reports, RBI plan and leak history; decide scope (clean, inspect, repair, retube) before shutdown.
- Isolate safely: drain, depressurise, steam-out or flush, then positively isolate with blinds and lock-out/tag-out; gas test before opening.
- Open and record as-found: photograph deposits, take deposit samples for analysis, measure fouling thickness and note gasket condition.
- Pull the bundle: use a bundle extractor or approved lifting plan; protect tubes and baffles from damage; check lifting lugs and slings.
- Clean: select the method from the table below; avoid damaging tube surfaces or enhanced tubes.
- Inspect: visual, ECT / RFT / IRIS as specified, tubesheet ligaments, gasket faces, shell and channel thickness (UT), nozzle welds.
- Repair: plug leaking or thin tubes at both ends, re-roll joints, sleeve tube ends or retube; record every plugged tube on the tubesheet map.
- Re-assemble: new gaskets of the specified type, bolt-up to ASME PCC-1 with calibrated tools and a bolting record.
- Pressure test: shell-side test to check tube and joint leaks, then tube-side test; ASME VIII Div. 1 hydrotest is normally 1.3 × MAWP × the stress ratio. Drain and dry stainless and copper-alloy units promptly.
- Hand back and baseline: record post-start-up U, ΔP and approach temperatures as the new clean baseline.
| Method | Best for | Typical use | Precautions |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-pressure hydrojetting (lance or rotary) | Tube ID and bundle exterior, most deposits | Most common turnaround method; 700–1500 bar for hard deposits | Certified operators, flexible lance guards, protect tube ends |
| Automated / robotic hydroblasting | Large bundles, repeat work | Faster, safer, consistent cleaning of tube IDs and shell side | Higher mobilisation cost |
| Chemical cleaning (circulation, CIP) | Scale, carbonates, oxides, biofilm, plate exchangers | In-situ cleaning without opening | Chemistry selection, inhibitor, passivation, effluent disposal |
| Mechanical rods, brushes and scrapers | Soft deposits in straight tubes | Small exchangers, condensers | Not for U-bends; may scratch soft alloys |
| Projectile / pig cleaning | Condenser and cooler tubes | Fast online-offline tube cleaning | Correct projectile size; not for heavy scale |
| Online ball cleaning (sponge ball systems) | Condensers and seawater coolers | Continuous fouling control | Ball recovery and strainer maintenance |
| Thermal or steam cleaning, bake-out | Polymer and organic deposits | Heavy hydrocarbon fouling | Temperature limits for gaskets and materials |
| Dry ice and abrasive blasting | Bundle exterior, air cooler fins | Removing soft deposits from fins | Fin damage risk; dust control |
Tube plugging, retubing and bundle replacement
Plugging takes leaking or thin tubes out of service quickly, but every plugged tube reduces area and raises velocity in the remaining tubes. Many operators set a review point at about 5–10% of tubes plugged; beyond that a thermal-hydraulic re-rating decides whether to sleeve, retube or replace the bundle. Plugs must be compatible with the tube material and pressure, both ends of the tube must be plugged, and a tube that has failed from vibration should trigger a check of the neighbouring tubes, which are usually next.
| KPI | How to calculate | What it tells you | Typical action level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fouling resistance Rf | 1/Ufouled − 1/Uclean | Actual deposit resistance vs design allowance | Rf at or above design value → plan cleaning |
| Cleanliness factor | Uactual / Uclean × 100% | Percentage of clean performance retained | Below about 70–85% (service dependent) |
| Pressure drop ratio | ΔPactual / ΔPclean (at same flow) | Blockage or deposit thickness | Above about 1.5–2 → investigate |
| Approach temperature | Th,out − Tc,in (cooler) | Process limitation and energy loss | Rising trend at constant load |
| Tubes plugged | Plugged tubes / total tubes × 100% | Remaining area and bundle health | About 5–10% → re-rate or retube |
| Leak frequency | Tube leaks per exchanger per year | Reliability and damage mechanism activity | Any repeat leak → root cause analysis |
| Energy penalty | Extra fuel or steam to make up lost duty | Cost of fouling in money terms | Use to justify cleaning or online monitoring |
Golden rules from the field
- A clean exchanger is a cheap exchanger. Planned cleaning almost always costs less than lost throughput, extra fuel and emergency repairs.
- Trend, don’t guess. Track U, ΔP and approach temperature monthly; a falling recovery after each cleaning shows the real problem is upstream.
- Keep the water moving. Most cooling-water exchanger failures start where velocity is low or the unit was left full of hydrotest water.
- Bolt it right the first time. Most hydrotest and start-up leaks are gasket and bolting problems – follow ASME PCC-1 and keep a bolting record.
- Map every tube. Before-and-after photos, deposit analysis, NDT results and plugged-tube maps are the proof of reliability for the next turnaround.
Frequently asked questions about heat exchangers
What is a heat exchanger and how does it work?
A heat exchanger is equipment that transfers heat from a hotter fluid to a colder fluid, usually through a metal wall that keeps the fluids separate. Heat passes through the hot-side film, the wall and the cold-side film, and the rate is given by Q = U x A x F x LMTD, where U is the overall heat transfer coefficient, A the area and LMTD the log mean temperature difference.
What are the main types of heat exchangers?
The main types are shell-and-tube, double-pipe (hairpin), plate (gasketed, brazed and welded), plate-fin, spiral, air-cooled (fin-fan), direct-contact (such as cooling towers and spray condensers) and regenerative exchangers (fixed-bed and rotary). Shell-and-tube exchangers are the most common in refineries, petrochemical plants and power stations.
Which heat exchanger flow arrangement is the most efficient?
True counterflow is the most efficient because it keeps the largest average temperature difference along the exchanger and allows the cold outlet temperature to exceed the hot outlet temperature (a temperature cross). Parallel flow is the least efficient, and crossflow and multipass arrangements fall in between.
What is the difference between a shell-and-tube and a plate heat exchanger?
A shell-and-tube exchanger is robust and suits very high pressures and temperatures, dirty fluids and large duties. A plate heat exchanger has a much higher heat transfer coefficient and area per unit volume, allows temperature approaches of 1 to 2 degrees C and is easy to extend, but gasketed units are limited to roughly 25 to 30 bar and about 180 degrees C by the gaskets.
What does TEMA AES, BEM or BEU mean?
TEMA uses three letters for the front head, shell and rear head. AES is a removable-cover channel, one-pass shell and floating head with backing device; BEM is a bonnet, one-pass shell and fixed tubesheet; BEU is a bonnet, one-pass shell and U-tube bundle. The size is given before the letters, such as 24-192 AES.
How do you calculate the required heat exchanger area?
Calculate the duty from the heat balance, Q = m x cp x delta T. Calculate the counterflow LMTD from the terminal temperature differences, apply the correction factor F for the shell and pass arrangement, estimate the overall U, then calculate A = Q / (U x F x LMTD). For example, 1500 kW with U = 450 W/m2K, F = 0.958 and LMTD = 50.98 K needs about 68 m2.
What is a fouling factor in a heat exchanger?
A fouling factor (fouling resistance) is the extra thermal resistance caused by deposits on the heat transfer surface, expressed in m2K/W. It is found from plant data as Rf = 1/U fouled minus 1/U clean. TEMA gives typical design values such as 0.000088 m2K/W for clean sea water and 0.00035 to 0.00088 m2K/W for crude oil.
How often should heat exchangers be cleaned?
Clean when monitoring shows that U has fallen to the design fouling allowance, pressure drop limits throughput or the approach temperature limits the process, rather than on a fixed calendar. Many refinery exchangers are cleaned at each turnaround (every 3 to 6 years), while fouling services such as crude preheat trains or cooling water coolers may need online or interim cleaning.
How many tubes can be plugged in a heat exchanger?
There is no single code limit. Common practice is to allow plugging of about 5 to 10 percent of tubes, but the real limit is set by a thermal and hydraulic check of the remaining area, the higher tube velocity and pressure drop, and the risk of further leaks. Plug both ends of each leaking tube and record its location on a tubesheet map.
What is the 10/13 rule for heat exchanger tube rupture?
API 521 allows tube rupture to be excluded as a relief case when the design pressure of the low-pressure side, including connected systems, is at least 10/13 of the design pressure of the high-pressure side. Below this ratio, relief protection or a dynamic tube rupture analysis is required.
Which NDT method is used to inspect heat exchanger tubes?
Eddy current testing is used for non-ferromagnetic tubes such as stainless steel, copper alloys and titanium. Remote field testing, near field testing or magnetic flux leakage are used for carbon steel and finned tubes, and IRIS ultrasonic testing gives the most accurate wall thickness and is used to verify electromagnetic results.
Test your knowledge
1. Which flow arrangement allows a temperature cross in a single pass?
2. In TEMA designation AES, what does the letter S stand for?
3. A corrosive, high-pressure, fouling cooling water stream should normally be placed on the:
4. Terminal temperature differences are 80 K and 30 K. The LMTD is about:
5. Which NDT method is best suited to stainless steel and titanium tubes?
Related Aienginear guides and tools
References and standards
- Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association – Standards of the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association, 11th edition.
- ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII Divisions 1 and 2 (including Part UHX), and Section V (NDE).
- API Std 660 / ISO 16812 – Shell-and-tube Heat Exchangers; API Std 661 / ISO 13706 – Air-cooled Heat Exchangers; API Std 662 / ISO 15547 – Plate Heat Exchangers; API Std 664 – Spiral Plate Heat Exchangers.
- API Std 521 / ISO 23251 – Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems (tube rupture).
- API 510, API RP 571, API RP 572, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, API RP 580 and API RP 581 – inspection, damage mechanisms, fitness-for-service and RBI.
- ASME PCC-1 – Guidelines for Pressure Boundary Bolted Flange Joint Assembly; ASME PCC-2 – Repair of Pressure Equipment and Piping.
- ASME PTC 12.5 and PTC 30; AHRI Standard 400; HEI Standards for Steam Surface Condensers and Closed Feedwater Heaters; ALPEMA Standards.
- Kern, D. Q., Process Heat Transfer; Incropera et al., Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer; Shah and Sekulić, Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design – general heat transfer theory.

